|
Tammy Boise, Idaho
2/27/2006
Survey ID:
18426 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lucy Boise, ID
2/22/2006
Survey ID:
18274 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Meridian, Id
2/21/2006
Survey ID:
17668 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Meridian, ID
2/20/2006
Survey ID:
18158 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gayle Spokane, WA
2/16/2006
Survey ID:
18122 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mimi Caldwell, Idaho
2/15/2006
Survey ID:
18013 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shelle Princeton, ID
2/14/2006
Survey ID:
17809 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Susan Clarkston, WA
2/11/2006
Survey ID:
17853 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Boise, ID
2/11/2006
Survey ID:
17870 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ron ,
2/10/2006
Survey ID:
17632 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Brett Meridian, ID
2/9/2006
Survey ID:
17773 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly Star, ID
2/6/2006
Survey ID:
17776 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Monica Kamiah, Id
2/2/2006
Survey ID:
17625 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Boise, ID
1/29/2006
Survey ID:
17526 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dan_Holly Boise, ID
1/23/2006
Survey ID:
17467 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tara and Bradley Mountain Home, ID
1/21/2006
Survey ID:
17479 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Eric Boise, ID
1/18/2006
Survey ID:
17317 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Everett, WA
1/6/2006
Survey ID:
17043 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
name withheld
1/6/2006
Survey ID:
17091 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
Aspen Village product reviewed: Unit 067
Comments:
Condo 69 is a bit dated. Everything worked fine but it looks like 1975. Maybe time to update the look. Shag carpet, harvest gold appliances need to go.
What really caused problems was the way the construction workers parked in front of the new condos. They blocked the drive several times forcing us to find another route into Condo 69. In the summer that probably would not cause as much problem but in winter, limited areas for turning around makes for an unacceptable hassle. The attitude we saw was that the constructions workers and delivery people viewed the driveway as their private access route to the construction site. No consideration was given to residents. Truly unfortunate.
|
Good Value |
Met Expectations |
Do
Again |
out of three |
out of three |
out of three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie ,
1/4/2006
Survey ID:
16998 |
Overall
Ranking
out of 5 |
|
|
|
|